



A ranked link used to be the prize. Now buyers compare products and build shortlists inside the AI answer, and the brands named there get looked at first.
Getting into that answer is the job of generative engine optimization. The term comes from a 2023 research paper, and the paper’s findings are more specific than most GEO advice you’ll read.
Generative engine optimization is the work of getting AI systems to retrieve your content and include your brand when they answer.
A generative engine is a search system that retrieves sources and then writes a new answer from them. ChatGPT search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot all work this way.
GEO success can take four forms:
Citation: one of your URLs appears as a source link for the answer.
Mention: your brand is named in the answer text. A link isn’t required.
Recommendation: your product appears in a shortlist or a "best tool" answer.
Accurate description: the answer describes what you do correctly and with current facts.
Our glossary entry on generative engine optimization gives the short definition and related terms.
The term comes from the paper "GEO: Generative Engine Optimization" by Pranjal Aggarwal and colleagues. The authors were at Princeton University and IIT Delhi, and the paper was accepted at KDD 2024.
They described GEO as a new way for content creators to increase their visibility in generative engine responses. To test it, they built GEO-bench, a benchmark of 10,000 queries across 25 domains.
The terms overlap. AEO, or answer engine optimization, grew out of featured snippets and voice answers. GEO focuses on answers written by generative AI.
LLM SEO and AI SEO are broader labels for the same shift. Our comparison of AEO vs SEO vs GEO explains where each one starts and ends.
No engine publishes its full formula, and each platform uses its own index and models. Most follow four broad stages.
Google confirms that AI Overviews and AI Mode may use query fan-out, issuing multiple related searches across subtopics. A prompt about the best CRM for a small team can fan out into separate searches on pricing and on reviews.
So a page can be cited for a sub-question you never targeted. And a brand that fits the main prompt can still be left out if no page answers the sub-questions.
The same prompt can return different sources on another platform or in another location. Session and model version change the result too. There’s no stable position one to defend.
What you can measure is how often you appear across the prompts your buyers ask. So GEO gets reported as rates over a prompt set.
GEO doesn’t replace SEO. Google’s guide to optimizing for generative AI features says these features rely on its core Search ranking and quality systems.
The same guide says you don’t need new machine-readable files, AI text files, special markup or Markdown to appear. Pages still have to be crawlable and indexed, and worth reading. That’s the entry ticket.
What changes is the unit of success and how you measure it:
| What changes | SEO | GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Target | A ranked link. | The answer text and the sources listed with it. |
| Core metrics | Rankings and clicks. | Mentions, citations and share of voice. |
| Research starts from | Keywords. | Full prompts and their follow-up questions. |
| Who picks the sources | In a list of links, the user does the picking. | The AI system filters sources before anyone clicks. |
AI answers now sit between buyers and websites.
Google’s AI Overviews passed 2 billion monthly users in 2025, according to TechCrunch’s report on Alphabet’s earnings call.
Fewer people click through when an AI summary appears. A Pew Research Center study found users clicked a result in 8% of visits with an AI summary, versus 15% without one.
When fewer users click, the brands named in the answer get most of the attention. If a competitor is in the answer and you aren’t, you can lose the deal before your website loads.
The GEO paper tested nine ways of rewriting a source page. It then measured how much of each generated answer drew on that source.
Citing sources, adding quotations and adding statistics performed best, with relative gains of 30% to 40% on the paper’s main visibility metric.
Fluency and easy-to-understand rewrites added 15% to 30%.
Keyword stuffing was the only method that scored below the unchanged text.
Lower-ranked pages gained the most. A source ranked fifth in search saw a 115.1% visibility increase from citing sources.
Sprinkling numbers on a page won’t do it. Engines reward evidence a reader can check, because a specific, verifiable passage is easier to quote.
A 2025 study by Chen and colleagues, "Generative Engine Optimization: How to Dominate AI Search", adds a second lesson. It found AI search engines strongly favor earned media, meaning third-party sources, over brand-owned and social content.
Our guide to the best GEO techniques turns these findings into page-level changes, including technical GEO.
Ansvisor, an open-source AI search intelligence platform, tracks prompts about AI search. It covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Perplexity.
The figures in this section are Ansvisor tracking data, September 15 to October 14, 2026. In that period, AI engines cited 746,702 links across 103,427 tracked results, about 7.2 links per answer.
| AI engine | Links cited per answer |
|---|---|
| Google AI Overviews | About 14 |
| Gemini | About 12 |
| ChatGPT | About 5 |
| Google AI Mode | Fewer than 5 |
| Copilot | Fewer than 5 |
The bigger finding was about brands. Ansvisor earned 19.7k citations and Semrush 19.2k, almost the same number.
Across the brands we track, mention counts and citation counts can differ several-fold. Being a source doesn’t make you the answer.
So GEO has two jobs. Earn citations with evidence-rich pages. Earn mentions by describing your brand and category the same way everywhere it appears on the web.
Engines cite passages that answer a question directly and still make sense when lifted out of the page. Five formats do most of the work.
Load each section with specifics: names, numbers, dates, steps. A generic summary gives the engine nothing worth quoting.
List 25 to 100 prompts across definitions, problems, comparisons and "best tool" questions. Include prompts that don’t name your brand.
Use Search Console queries, sales call notes and support tickets as input. Prompt monitoring with volume estimates shows which prompts have real demand, so you can drop the rest.
Run every prompt on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude. Log who gets mentioned, which URLs are cited and how each answer describes you.
Treat each platform as its own channel. In our data, links per answer ranged from fewer than 5 to about 14. Some engines simply have more citation slots than others.
Work out why you’re absent. Either no page answers the question, the page lacks evidence, or third-party sources favor a competitor.
Read the cited sources for each prompt. They show which page types and domains the engine trusts for that topic today.
Answer the question in the first sentences of the matching section. Add named sources and statistics where they help the reader, and a short expert quote if you have one.
Then go after the third-party sites that keep showing up in citations: review sites, communities, publications. Earned mentions matter because engines lean on third-party sources.
Check the same prompt set every week with the same settings. Compare mention rate, citation rate and share of voice before and after each change.
For owners and team routines, see our GEO best practices for marketing teams. Leaders planning budget and KPIs can use the CMO guide to GEO.
| Metric | What it measures |
|---|---|
| Prompt coverage | The share of tracked prompts where your brand appears at all. |
| Mention rate | How often answers name your brand. |
| Citation rate | How often answers link to one of your URLs. |
| Share of voice | Your mentions or citations compared with tracked competitors. |
| Answer accuracy | Whether the description of your product is correct and current. |
| AI referral traffic | Visits from AI platforms and the pages they land on. |
Google added generative AI performance reports to Search Console in June 2026 and rolled them out to all sites on August 31, 2026. They show your impressions in AI Overviews, AI Mode and Discover by page, country, device and date.
They don’t show queries or clicks, and they don’t say which competitors the answers name. Use them as a free, Google-only input next to prompt tracking.
| Myth | What Google says |
|---|---|
| "You need an llms.txt file." | Google says llms.txt neither helps nor harms visibility in Google Search. |
| "Cut content into tiny chunks." | Google says there is no requirement to break content into small pieces for AI. |
| "Collect mentions anywhere you can." | Google says seeking inauthentic mentions is not as helpful as it might seem. |
| "Schema guarantees citations." | Google says no special schema.org markup is needed for its generative AI features. |
| "A tool can see Google’s AI ranking." | Google says no third-party tool has access to its internal ranking or AI systems. |
Ansvisor runs your prompt set on a schedule across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Perplexity. Claude tracking is available on Enterprise plans. Every answer is stored, so you can see what changed and when.
Answer engine insights show your mentions and sentiment against competitors, plus share of voice.
Citation monitoring shows which of your URLs are cited and which sources replace you.
If you’re comparing platforms, our review of the best GEO tools covers other options too.
Start a 14-day free trial and run your first GEO baseline this week, or self-host the open-source project on GitHub.
GEO, short for generative engine optimization, means shaping your content so AI assistants use it when they answer. You want to be named in the answer and linked as a source in ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot and similar tools.
No. AI search still runs on crawlable, indexed pages, and Google calls optimizing for its AI features SEO. What GEO adds is new measurement: how often AI answers mention and cite you, and your share of voice.
It comes from a 2023 research paper by Pranjal Aggarwal and colleagues at Princeton University and IIT Delhi, accepted at KDD 2024. The paper tested nine content changes and found that some raised a source’s visibility in AI answers by up to 40%.
Run a fixed set of prompts on each AI platform every week. Record whether your brand is mentioned, which of your URLs are cited and which competitors appear. Then report mention rate, citation rate, share of voice and AI referral traffic over time.
Pages that AI search tools retrieve live can be picked up after they’re recrawled. How a model describes your brand from its training data changes more slowly. Judge results on trends across four to eight weeks of repeated checks, not on single answers.
Co-founder at Ansvisor
Cihan Geyik is the co-founder of Ansvisor, an open-source, cloud-ready AI Visibility platform for AI Search. With more than 15 years of experience in digital marketing and growth, he writes about AI visibility, AI search, AEO, GEO, citations, and answer engines. He focuses on helping brands understand and improve their presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other AI-powered discovery platforms.
Each prompt you win brings more mentions, more citations and more buyers. Ansvisor keeps finding the next one.
Add Ansvisor as a Preferred Source to see more of our AI Search, AEO, GEO, and AI Visibility insights across Google.
© 2026 Ansvisor. All rights reserved. Ansvisor is an open-source AI Search Intelligence Platform for AI Visibility. Ansvisor is a brand owned and operated by Empler AI Inc.
The open-source AI Search Execution Platform. Track how AI answers talk about your brand and act on it.
Open source · MIT license© 2026 Ansvisor, a brand of Empler AI Inc. · 1401 PE Ave. Unit 105, Wilmington, DE 19806, United States

