
Bing Webmaster Tools is Microsoft's platform for helping website owners understand and improve how their websites are discovered, crawled, indexed, represented, and surfaced across Bing's search ecosystem.
Historically, the platform focused primarily on traditional search performance, crawling, indexing, sitemaps, technical SEO, URL inspection, and search queries.
In 2026, Bing expanded the platform into generative AI visibility with the introduction of AI Performance.
AI Performance provides first-party information about how website content is cited within supported AI-generated experiences, including Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated summaries in Bing, and select partner AI integrations.
This makes Bing Webmaster Tools relevant not only to traditional SEO but also to AI Search, Answer Engine Optimization, Generative Engine Optimization, and citation intelligence.
AI-powered discovery changes what website visibility means.
Traditional search performance is usually evaluated through metrics such as impressions, clicks, rankings, and search queries.
Generative AI systems can create a different discovery experience in which information from websites is retrieved and used directly inside generated answers.
In this environment, visibility can include whether a website becomes a source for an AI-generated response.
Bing Webmaster Tools now provides information about both layers:
Traditional Search Performance + AI Citation Performance
This allows publishers to investigate how their content performs across conventional Bing Search and supported AI-generated experiences from the same Microsoft-owned data environment.
AI Performance is a Bing Webmaster Tools report that shows how website content is used and cited within supported AI-generated answers.
Microsoft introduced AI Performance in public preview in February 2026.
The report extends Bing Webmaster Tools beyond conventional search analytics by providing information about citation activity across Microsoft's AI-powered discovery ecosystem.
AI Performance can show:
Additional preview capabilities include:
According to Microsoft's current Bing Webmaster Tools documentation, AI Performance reflects citation and grounding activity across supported AI experiences including:
The data should therefore not be interpreted as a universal measurement of visibility across the entire AI Search ecosystem.
For example, Bing Webmaster Tools should not automatically be treated as a first-party visibility source for independent systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or Perplexity.
AI Performance measures visible citation activity associated with content from a verified website.
Its primary purpose is to show how often website content appears as a referenced source within supported AI-generated answers.
Important measurements include:
These metrics describe citation activity rather than conventional search ranking performance.
Total Citations represents the number of times content from the website was visibly referenced or displayed as a source within supported AI-generated answers during the selected period.
This is fundamentally different from a traditional search impression.
A citation indicates that the website's content was used as a visible source within an AI answer.
It does not necessarily indicate that the user clicked the citation or visited the website.
No.
Microsoft explicitly distinguishes citations from traffic.
A citation indicates that website content was visibly referenced or shown as a source within an AI-generated answer.
It does not mean that a user clicked the source.
The broader journey can be represented as:
Grounding → AI Answer → Citation → Click → Website Session → Business Outcome
Bing AI Performance primarily provides information around the grounding and citation portions of this journey.
Cited Pages represents the number of unique pages from a website that were cited within supported AI-generated answers on a given day.
This helps publishers understand whether AI citation visibility is concentrated on a small number of URLs or distributed across a broader section of the website.
A website may receive many citations from a few high-performing pages, while another site may receive citations across a much larger content library.
Average Cited Pages represents the average number of unique website pages cited per day across the selected period.
This provides a broader view of how much of the website participates in Microsoft's supported AI answer ecosystem.
It should not be interpreted as a quality score or ranking metric.
Page-Level Citation Activity shows how frequently individual URLs from a website were cited within supported AI-generated answers.
This allows publishers to identify which pages are functioning as important sources for AI-generated responses.
For example, teams can investigate whether citations concentrate around:
Citation frequency does not indicate the page's ranking, authority, importance, or exact role within an individual response.
Grounding Queries are grouped phrases associated with content from a website being retrieved and cited within AI-generated answers.
They help publishers understand the topics and phrases around which their website contributes information to supported AI experiences.
For example, a website about renewable energy might see grounding queries such as:
These phrases can reveal the subject areas where Bing's AI systems associate a website with useful source material.
No.
This distinction is particularly important when interpreting Bing AI Performance.
Microsoft states that Grounding Queries are grouped representations of phrases associated with retrieval and citation activity.
They are not complete user prompts or exact questions entered by individual users.
A Grounding Query should therefore not be interpreted as a direct record of what a specific person asked Copilot.
The distinction can be represented as:
User Prompt ≠ Grounding Query
Grounding Queries provide aggregated retrieval context rather than exact prompt logs.
Grounding Queries provide evidence about the topics for which Microsoft's AI systems are retrieving and citing a website.
This can help teams identify:
This makes Grounding Query data particularly useful for evidence-based Generative Engine Optimization.
Yes.
Bing AI Performance provides Grounding Query–Page Mapping.
A user can select a Grounding Query and view pages from the website that were cited in association with that query.
The reverse relationship can also be explored.
Users can select a page and inspect the Grounding Queries associated with its citation activity.
The relationship is many-to-many:
One Grounding Query → Multiple Pages
and:
One Page → Multiple Grounding Queries
Citation Share measures the percentage of citation activity attributed to a website out of all citations shown for a specific Grounding Query.
It adds a relative visibility dimension to raw citation counts.
A simplified representation is:
Website Citations for Grounding Query ÷ All Citations for Grounding Query = Citation Share
This can help publishers understand how much of the available citation space their website receives around a particular query.
Total Citations measures volume.
Citation Share measures relative presence.
A website can receive many citations but still have a relatively small Citation Share if many other sources are also frequently cited for the same Grounding Query.
Conversely, a site with fewer total citations may have a strong Citation Share within a smaller or more specialized query space.
No.
Microsoft states that Citation Share does not reveal the identities of other websites occupying the remaining citation space.
It shows the verified website's relative share for the selected Grounding Query without exposing competitor domain-level data.
This is an important limitation compared with dedicated AI Search Intelligence platforms that can monitor specific competitors directly.
Not exactly.
Citation Share measures a website's relative citation presence for a specific Bing Grounding Query.
AI Share of Voice can use a broader methodology that evaluates brand visibility relative to competitors across a defined set of prompts, platforms, markets, or answer types.
The concepts are related but should not be treated as interchangeable.
Intents are a preview capability that classifies Grounding Queries according to the broader purpose associated with the query.
Microsoft's current documentation includes examples such as:
Intent labels are assigned through AI and machine-learning classifiers.
Not every AI citation has the same strategic value.
For example, an ecommerce company may care particularly about citation visibility around:
A publisher may place more importance on informational or research-oriented visibility.
Intent classification helps teams move from counting citations toward understanding the context in which those citations occur.
Topics group related Grounding Queries into broader thematic clusters.
For example:
Topic: Solar Energy
could contain Grounding Queries such as:
This creates a higher-level view of AI visibility than analyzing each phrase individually.
Organizations often plan content around broader customer problems, themes, categories, and markets rather than individual phrases.
Topic clustering can help teams identify:
This can make AI Performance data more useful for editorial and content strategy.
Yes.
The Compare capability allows users to compare citation performance across two periods.
For example:
Last 30 Days vs Previous 30 Days
or two custom periods can be compared.
This helps teams observe whether citation activity is increasing, decreasing, or remaining relatively stable.
No.
Microsoft explicitly warns that changes in citation performance are observational.
Citation activity can change because of many factors, including:
A citation increase after a content update can therefore provide useful evidence, but it does not establish causation by itself.
Microsoft states that AI Performance data is refreshed daily with a short processing delay.
The report is designed primarily for trend analysis and comparative insights rather than real-time monitoring.
The current AI Performance documentation lists:
Available historical depth and reporting options can evolve as the product develops.
No.
Microsoft describes the data as aggregated, summarized, and representative rather than a complete log of every citation.
Important limitations include:
The data should therefore be used primarily for identifying patterns and trends.
Yes.
Microsoft allows AI Performance data to be exported for additional analysis.
Available exports include:
Current export formats include CSV and Excel.
This can make Bing AI Performance useful as a first-party data source inside broader AI Search intelligence and reporting systems.
Yes.
Bing Webmaster Tools continues to provide conventional Bing Search performance information alongside its newer AI capabilities.
This creates an important distinction between:
Search Performance → Search discovery and traffic
and:
AI Performance → Grounding and citation activity
The two datasets describe different forms of visibility.
A page can perform differently across traditional search and AI-generated answers.
For example, a page might have:
Comparing these signals can reveal opportunities that traditional rank tracking alone may miss.
Yes.
URL Inspection allows website owners to inspect URLs within verified sites.
The tool can provide information about:
It also includes a Live URL option that allows publishers to inspect how Bingbot accesses a current page.
Bing states that AI Performance reflects content eligible for indexing.
If an important page has crawling or indexing problems, it may also reduce the page's ability to participate in Bing and Microsoft's supported grounding ecosystem.
A useful investigation can therefore be:
AI Citation Gap → Target Page → URL Inspection → Crawl and Index Review → Action
URL Inspection includes markup information that can help publishers understand whether Bing can read structured information on a page.
The current documentation references markup formats including:
Structured data can make entity and content information more explicit, but it does not guarantee inclusion in AI-generated answers.
Yes.
Site Scan is Bing Webmaster Tools' on-demand technical SEO auditing capability.
It crawls a website and identifies common technical SEO issues.
This creates a useful connection between:
AI Performance → Citation Opportunity → Technical Website Analysis
However, Site Scan should not be treated as equivalent to a specialized large-scale technical crawler such as Screaming Frog.
Site Explorer provides a structured view of a website as Bing understands it.
It can help users navigate site structure and investigate issues associated with URLs, including:
This can be useful when investigating why strategically important pages are not appearing as expected across Bing's ecosystem.
Yes.
The Sitemaps report allows website owners to submit and monitor XML sitemaps.
Microsoft's current webmaster guidance recommends that sitemaps:
Sitemaps can support URL discovery and freshness but do not guarantee search rankings or AI citations.
IndexNow is an open protocol that allows websites to notify participating search engines when URLs are added, updated, or deleted.
Instead of waiting for a crawler to discover every change independently, websites can proactively signal that content has changed.
Bing strongly recommends IndexNow for keeping indexed information fresh.
AI-generated answers benefit from access to accurate and current information.
Microsoft's webmaster guidance connects strong URL discovery and freshness practices with eligibility across Bing Search and AI-powered grounding experiences.
IndexNow can therefore support the infrastructure layer of AI Search by helping Bing discover updated content more efficiently.
The relationship should not be interpreted as:
IndexNow Submission = AI Citation
A more accurate chain is:
Content Update → IndexNow → Discovery/Crawl → Indexing Eligibility → Potential Grounding → Potential Citation
No.
IndexNow informs Bing that a URL has changed.
It does not instruct Microsoft Copilot to cite or recommend the page.
Retrieval and citation remain dependent on relevance, content quality, context, AI system behavior, and other factors.
Yes.
Microsoft states that Bing respects content-owner preferences expressed through robots.txt and other supported control mechanisms.
Bing's current webmaster guidelines also connect discoverability and crawl accessibility with eligibility for grounding across Bing and Copilot experiences.
Website owners should therefore review crawler directives when investigating AI Search accessibility.
Yes.
Microsoft Copilot is explicitly included among the supported AI experiences represented within AI Performance.
This makes Bing Webmaster Tools one of the most important first-party sources for publishers wanting to understand how their own content is cited across Microsoft's generative AI ecosystem.
Not as a dedicated first-party ChatGPT monitoring system.
AI Performance is designed around Microsoft's supported AI experiences and selected partner integrations.
Publishers requiring systematic ChatGPT visibility monitoring should use an AI Search Intelligence platform that explicitly supports ChatGPT.
Not as a dedicated first-party Gemini visibility platform.
Gemini is part of Google's AI ecosystem rather than Microsoft's.
Bing AI Performance should therefore not be interpreted as complete Gemini visibility data.
Bing Webmaster Tools should not be treated as a comprehensive first-party visibility source for Claude or Perplexity.
Its official AI Performance coverage centers on Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated summaries in Bing, and select partner integrations.
Broader multi-platform monitoring requires additional data sources.
No.
Bing exposes Grounding Queries rather than exact individual user prompts.
This is one of the most important distinctions between Bing AI Performance and dedicated prompt-monitoring platforms.
Grounding Queries explain retrieval themes.
Prompt monitoring evaluates defined questions and the AI-generated answers returned for those questions.
No.
Microsoft states that AI Performance data is aggregated and does not expose individual AI-generated responses.
As a result, users cannot use Bing AI Performance alone to reconstruct every answer in which a website was cited.
Not directly in the same way as a dedicated AI competitive intelligence platform.
Citation Share can show a website's relative presence within the citation space for a Grounding Query, but Microsoft does not reveal which competitor domains hold the remaining share.
This protects other publishers' data but limits direct competitive analysis.
Not as a comprehensive cross-platform competitor Share of Voice metric.
Citation Share provides a useful relative citation signal within Bing's AI ecosystem, but it does not identify competing brands and does not measure visibility across independent AI platforms.
A broader AI Share of Voice analysis typically requires:
AI Performance is primarily focused on citation and grounding activity rather than comprehensive brand sentiment analysis.
It does not replace dedicated monitoring of how AI systems describe, compare, or characterize a brand within complete generated answers.
AI Performance citations themselves do not represent traffic.
Website analytics can provide additional downstream information when visits from Microsoft or AI-powered experiences can be identified through referral or campaign information.
This creates a broader measurement model:
Bing AI Citation → Referral → Website Analytics → Engagement → Conversion
Yes, in a limited but meaningful sense.
A website can receive a visible citation inside an AI-generated answer even when the user does not click through to the website.
AI Performance can therefore reveal a form of visibility that conventional traffic analytics would not capture.
This is particularly important in AI Search, where information can influence a user's decision without producing an immediate website session.
Bing Webmaster Tools and Google Search Console are first-party webmaster platforms for different search ecosystems.
Google Search Console primarily provides first-party information about Google Search and supported Google generative AI experiences.
Bing Webmaster Tools provides first-party information about Bing Search and Microsoft's supported AI experiences.
Using both can provide a broader view of search and AI discovery than relying on either platform alone.
Bing Webmaster Tools primarily describes what happens before or around discovery.
Google Analytics primarily measures behavior after identifiable users reach a website or application.
The two datasets can therefore complement one another:
Bing Search / AI Visibility → Website Visit → Analytics → Engagement → Business Outcome
Bing Webmaster Tools provides authoritative first-party information about a website's performance within Microsoft's ecosystem.
This is extremely valuable but narrower than a dedicated multi-platform AI visibility system.
A dedicated AI visibility platform can add:
Bing Webmaster Tools should therefore be treated as an important first-party AI Search data source rather than a complete replacement for broader AI Search Intelligence.
Yes.
Bing Webmaster Tools can support Answer Engine Optimization by showing how content participates in supported AI-generated answers.
Grounding Queries, cited pages, Citation Share, Topics, and Intents can help teams understand which content and subject areas contribute to AI answers.
Technical tools such as URL Inspection, Site Scan, sitemaps, and IndexNow can then support the website infrastructure behind that visibility.
Yes.
AI Performance makes Bing Webmaster Tools particularly relevant to Generative Engine Optimization.
A practical workflow can be:
Grounding Query → Citation Performance → Cited Page → Content Gap → Optimization → Compare Performance
However, GEO extends beyond Microsoft's ecosystem, so broader optimization programs may combine Bing data with other AI platforms and data sources.
Microsoft recommends using AI Performance as a signal for reviewing how website content aligns with the topics and intents associated with citation activity.
Potential actions include:
None of these actions guarantees a citation.
They should be treated as content-quality and machine-understanding improvements rather than deterministic ranking techniques.
Yes, indirectly.
Grounding Queries, Topics, Intents, Citation Share, and cited-page information can help teams identify areas where their website receives limited citation visibility.
For example:
Important Topic + Low Citation Share + Limited Relevant Content = Potential Opportunity
However, Bing data alone does not establish whether that opportunity has meaningful business value.
Combining AI Performance with search demand, analytics, customer data, and business priorities can create a stronger prioritization model.
Ansvisor is an AI Search Intelligence platform that can complement first-party data sources such as Bing Webmaster Tools by connecting search and AI performance signals with broader Prompt Discovery, AI Visibility, Citation Intelligence, competitor analysis, and optimization opportunities.
Bing Webmaster Tools can provide authoritative Microsoft ecosystem signals such as:
These signals can become additional evidence when determining which AI Search opportunities deserve attention.
Grounding Queries reveal topics and phrases already associated with a website's citation activity inside Microsoft's AI ecosystem.
They can therefore provide valuable evidence for discovering adjacent prompts worth monitoring.
For example:
Bing Grounding Query → Related Customer Intent → Prompt Discovery → Cross-Platform Monitoring
The Grounding Query itself should not be treated as an exact user prompt.
Instead, it can serve as a first-party signal for identifying relevant conversational demand and topic areas.
Bing AI Performance provides first-party citation data from Microsoft's ecosystem.
A broader Citation Intelligence system can combine that information with observed citations across other AI platforms.
This can help teams answer questions such as:
This creates a more complete source-intelligence model.
Citation volume alone does not indicate business value.
A more useful prioritization system can combine Bing AI Performance with additional signals such as:
The objective is to move from:
"Where are we cited?"
toward:
"Which citation and visibility opportunities should we act on?"
Bing Webmaster Tools provides first-party evidence from Microsoft's search and AI ecosystem.
Ansvisor can extend that evidence into a broader AI Search Intelligence workflow.
Using Ansvisor, teams can discover high-value prompts, analyze visibility and citations across multiple AI environments, identify competitor and third-party source gaps, and turn those signals into prioritized AEO and GEO opportunities.
A combined workflow can be represented as:
Bing Search & AI Data + Cross-Platform AI Behavior + Business Context → Opportunities → Actions → Measurement
Bing Webmaster Tools therefore becomes a valuable first-party intelligence source rather than a competing replacement for broader AI Search monitoring.
Bing Webmaster Tools now contains genuine native AI visibility functionality through AI Performance.
It can measure citation activity, cited pages, Grounding Queries, Citation Share, Topics, Intents, and trends across supported Microsoft AI experiences.
However, it remains a broader webmaster platform and its AI visibility coverage is centered on Microsoft's ecosystem.
It should therefore be described as a Search & AI Performance Platform rather than a universal multi-platform AI visibility tracker.
Bing Webmaster Tools can be useful to:
Any organization publishing public web content that wants to understand its visibility across Bing and Microsoft's supported AI ecosystem can benefit from the platform.
Bing AI Performance provides valuable first-party data, but important limitations remain.
These limitations make Bing Webmaster Tools especially valuable as one authoritative first-party data source inside a broader AI Search measurement stack.
Bing Webmaster Tools has evolved from a traditional search webmaster platform into an important first-party AI Search data source.
Its conventional tools provide information about search performance, crawling, indexing, sitemaps, structured markup, website architecture, and content freshness.
AI Performance adds a new layer by showing how eligible website content is grounded and cited within Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated Bing summaries, and select partner AI integrations.
This creates a broader visibility chain:
Website → Discovery → Crawl → Indexing → Grounding → AI Citation → Potential Visit → Business Outcome
Bing Webmaster Tools provides unusually strong first-party visibility across the earlier and middle portions of this chain.
Its Grounding Queries can reveal the themes associated with AI retrieval, cited pages show which URLs contribute to answers, Citation Share provides relative source visibility, and Topics and Intents add contextual layers around citation performance.
At the same time, the platform does not provide a complete picture of AI Search across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and every other independent AI environment.
Using Ansvisor, teams can combine first-party signals such as Bing AI Performance with broader Prompt Discovery, Citation Intelligence, AI Visibility Analysis, competitor intelligence, and AEO/GEO opportunities.
A broader AI Search Intelligence model can therefore be represented as:
First-Party Search Data + First-Party AI Data + Cross-Platform AI Behavior + Business Data → Intelligence → Opportunities → Actions → Validation
This makes Bing Webmaster Tools particularly valuable not as a replacement for AI Search Intelligence, but as an authoritative Microsoft-owned source of evidence that can strengthen AI Search decisions.
Ansvisor maintains a broader AI Visibility Glossary covering Bing Webmaster Tools and the platforms, metrics, technologies, protocols, data sources, and optimization concepts shaping AI Search, AEO, GEO, AI SEO, and agentic discovery.
Bing Webmaster Tools is Microsoft's search and AI performance platform for website owners. It provides Bing Search performance, crawling and indexing tools, URL Inspection, Site Scan, sitemaps and IndexNow, while AI Performance adds citation intelligence for supported Microsoft AI experiences.
Yes. AI Performance includes citation activity across Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated summaries in Bing, and select partner AI integrations. It shows total citations, cited pages, Grounding Queries and citation trends.
Grounding Queries are grouped phrases associated with content retrieved and cited in AI-generated answers. They are not exact user prompts. Bing also maps Grounding Queries to cited pages, allowing publishers to see which URLs contribute to particular retrieval themes.
Citation Share is the percentage of citations attributed to your site out of all citations shown for a particular Grounding Query. It measures relative citation presence, but Bing does not reveal which competitor domains hold the remaining share.
It now includes genuine AI visibility functionality, but it is better classified as a Search & AI Performance Platform. AI Performance provides first-party Microsoft ecosystem citation data, while broader AI Search Intelligence platforms are still needed for exact prompt monitoring, competitors, full generated answers, and cross-platform visibility across systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity.
Understand, measure, and optimize your AI visibility via Ansvisor.
✓ Add brand, domains and competitors
✓ Discover prompts and growth opportunities
✓ Track your AI visibility across major AI platforms
✓ Monitor citations, mentions, and competitors
✓ Measure AI traffic and customer discovery
✓ Receive AI recommendations based on AI insights
✓ Optimize authority, trust, and content quality
✓ Create content, automate analysis & action with AI agents
Continue exploring key AI visibility concepts.
Measure and improve how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers.
Learn more →Strategies for increasing visibility in answer engines and AI summaries.
Learn more →Optimizing content for AI-powered discovery experiences.
Learn more →Understand how OpenAI retrieves and synthesizes information.
Learn more →AI-generated summaries that appear directly in Google Search.
Learn more →Explore how Perplexity cites and presents sources.
Learn more →References and sources used by AI systems to support answers.
Learn more →Measure the quality and influence of cited sources.
Learn more →How easily AI systems can discover and reuse your content.
Learn more →New terms are added regularly.
Help us improve the page or suggest a new term →
Co-founder at Ansvisor
Cihan Geyik is the co-founder of Ansvisor, an open-source AI Visibility platform for AI Search. With more than 15 years of experience in digital marketing and growth, he writes about AI visibility, AI search, AEO, GEO, citations, and answer engines. He focuses on helping brands understand and improve their presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other AI-powered discovery platforms.





© 2026 Ansvisor. All rights reserved. Ansvisor is an open-source AI Search Intelligence Platform for AI Visibility.