



A leaderboard of who ChatGPT mentions most is nice to have. What you can act on is shorter: the prompts where competitors appear and you don’t, and the pages that put them there.
We’ll start with a free manual method you can run in a spreadsheet. Then come the metrics that matter, a worked example from our own data and the point where a competitor tracking tool saves you time.
Competitor tracking in ChatGPT means measuring how often rival brands appear in answers to your buyers’ prompts. You then compare that with your own presence.
A complete benchmark compares five things for every brand:
Our glossary covers AI competitor analysis in more detail.
Don’t start with your sales battlecards. ChatGPT may name brands you rarely meet in deals, such as a large suite, a free tool or a review site.
Run 20 unbranded category prompts and write down every brand each answer names. The three to five brands named most often are your ChatGPT competitor set.
Also note which third-party domains ChatGPT cites again and again. Review sites and directories aren’t rivals, and neither are forums. They still decide which rivals get named.
The manual method works for about 30 prompts and five brands. You need ChatGPT, a spreadsheet and the same setup on every check.
Use category, problem, "best tool for" and alternative prompts. Add a few comparison prompts, such as "[your brand] vs [competitor]".
Never measure your brand on one prompt set and a rival on another. Our guide to tracking prompts in ChatGPT explains how to build and freeze the set.
Use a Temporary Chat with personalization off, the same plan and the same country for every run.
OpenAI’s help article on ChatGPT web search says saved memories and approximate location can shape search results. Different settings can create fake gaps.
Run every prompt three times per check, each in a new chat. One run can show a rival that never appears again.
For each run, record all brands named, the brand ChatGPT recommends first, and every cited domain. Mark cited domains as yours, a competitor’s or third-party.
Put prompts in rows and brands in columns. In each cell, enter how many of the three runs named that brand, from 0 to 3.
Then sort the rows into four groups:
For every competitor gap, open the pages ChatGPT cited. Note whether they’re the rival’s own pages or third-party ones: review sites, forums, media articles.
Before you blame content, check access. OpenAI’s crawler documentation says sites that block OAI-SearchBot will not be shown in ChatGPT search answers.
Read how AI share of voice is defined, and our full guide on measuring AI share of voice across platforms.
It’s tempting to track who ChatGPT lists first. The data says that number moves too much to be useful on its own.
In SparkToro’s research on AI recommendations, one hospital appeared in 69 of 71 ChatGPT answers. It was the first mention in only 25 of them.
Its appearance rate was stable at 97%, while its position kept changing. Benchmark competitors on how often they appear, then use position only as a tiebreaker.
The GEO paper on generative engine optimization also found that what works for visibility varies by domain. So compare against rivals in your own category, not against general benchmarks.
Ansvisor, an open-source AI search intelligence platform, benchmarks itself against other AI visibility tools on a fixed prompt set.
From September 15 to October 14, 2026, those prompts produced 103,427 AI answers and 746,702 citations across all tracked AI platforms.
The competitor set includes Semrush, Profound, Ahrefs, Otterly and Peec AI.
In our tracking data, a brand’s share of voice can differ several-fold between AI engines in the same month.
The most cited third-party domains were reddit.com at a 14.5% citation share, youtube.com at 11.6% and github.com at 11.5%.
So a gap that shows up in only one engine is a channel gap, not a category gap. If that engine is ChatGPT, the next step is to earn presence on the sources it cites for the prompts rivals win.
Don’t copy a rival’s page. ChatGPT already has that answer, so a near copy gives it little reason to add you.
Track how ChatGPT describes each rival as well. Our guide to tracking ChatGPT brand mentions covers context and sentiment labels.
Keep your own trend in view too. Our ChatGPT visibility tracking guide shows the scorecard behind your own numbers.
Ansvisor tracks your brand and your competitors on the same prompts. Visibility scores and share of voice sit side by side, with mention and citation counts.
The ChatGPT visibility tracker lets you open each answer and see which sources supported a rival. You can also self-host the open-source project on GitHub.
Start a 14-day free trial and see which prompts your competitors win in ChatGPT.
Run one prompt set for all brands, with the same settings and the same number of runs. Count how often each brand is named and divide by total runs. Then compare share of voice and the prompts each brand wins.
Log every answer that names you or a rival, with the context and sentiment of each mention. Add comparison prompts such as "[brand] vs [competitor]". Review the exact wording each week, because it shows how ChatGPT positions each brand.
Start with the three to five brands that ChatGPT names most often for your category prompts. They can differ from the rivals your sales team meets. Add review sites or directories that dominate the citations, because they shape answers too.
Share of voice is your brand’s mentions divided by all mentions of you and your tracked competitors on the same prompts. It shows your relative presence. It’s only fair when every brand is measured on the same prompts and runs.
Use one prompt set across ChatGPT and other AI platforms, and score each brand per platform. A brand can lead in one assistant and trail in another. Review the cited sources for prompts where a competitor gains ground.
Co-founder at Ansvisor
Cihan Geyik is the co-founder of Ansvisor, an open-source, cloud-ready AI Visibility platform for AI Search. With more than 15 years of experience in digital marketing and growth, he writes about AI visibility, AI search, AEO, GEO, citations, and answer engines. He focuses on helping brands understand and improve their presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other AI-powered discovery platforms.
Each prompt you win brings more mentions, more citations and more buyers. Ansvisor keeps finding the next one.
Add Ansvisor as a Preferred Source to see more of our AI Search, AEO, GEO, and AI Visibility insights across Google.
© 2026 Ansvisor. All rights reserved. Ansvisor is an open-source AI Search Intelligence Platform for AI Visibility. Ansvisor is a brand owned and operated by Empler AI Inc.
The open-source AI Search Execution Platform. Track how AI answers talk about your brand and act on it.
Open source · MIT license© 2026 Ansvisor, a brand of Empler AI Inc. · 1401 PE Ave. Unit 105, Wilmington, DE 19806, United States

